1. Discussion Forum > 
  2. Bug Reports & Feedback
@liliana85

why do you practice unfair penalties without verifying them properly?

Dealspotr Support hello good day i want you to give me a clear answer regarding the unfair penalties that you carry out only to harm the people who dedicate time to you this, in the first case i was marked by some publications by format, grammar and incomplete information to you, wich is false since the dimensions are quite explicit, an invalidation that you made was simply because you entered the code and did not produce any type of discount, the other case was that there was a 15% off on Select Rompers, i do not know what it because it explains the terms of the deal well, the last case was a publication because the screenshot did not show the validation of the discount, i invite you go to the link and make purchase and verify the shipping cost before entering the code and then see the same after entering the code. go so you can see the difference, i see that you do the penalties without checking until the last case.

@DealspotrSupport

lilianamendoza For your validations with Gigi and Max and Secret Wood, there were both formatting issues in your tip and grammar issues. For your validation with Bits and Pieces, your screenshot looks fine so I will give you those points back.


I would recommend making your tip simpler, like "This deal works as described." That way the tip will not be an issue in the future.

@liliana85

Dealspotr Support hello i write again, because i find it very unusual the amount of injustices that they commit with the publications, i am treated according to you because i entered the information incorrectly or omitted something, explain to me what i omit, because i entered the right information for it that with the use of the code you got a 20% off on Onzie and added to it you told me that you were going to return the lost points for the previous case, i expect from you a prompt and satisfactory response.

@liliana85

Dealspotr Support hello i write you again because i do not understand what is the cruelty against me, because the mark my publications unfairly, i was marked a publication because supposedly i had to place single use code, which is false joined to verify the code and one works throughout the site. please check the publications well.

@liliana85

Dealspotr Support it is necessary to note that this code was not registered and that you enter it as new and to enter code you have to mark single-use code in the normal steps.

@DealspotrSupport

lilianamendoza You do not have to mark it as a single-use code, all of those options are optional depending on your deal.

@liliana85

Dealspotr Support hi i write you again because they continue the unfair penalties i was marked a (good morning snore solution mouthpiece value pack (single use code)) according to you because i wrongly enter the information or omit something, explain what i omit because i entered the information necessary for the deal, and with respect to the type of transcription you suggested to me that you could use that same one and i see that in others they simply (worked) and you have te validity as good there is no coherence i their corrections and they simply do that as a strategy for harming the people who spend time with this. please check the publications well and give me a coherent answer.

This reply has been removed.

@DealspotrSupport

lilianamendoza The Good Morning Snore deal was rejected because you put the same merchant in twice, which is against the rules. Your other deals were rejected because of improper use of the single-use code flag.

@liliana85

Dealspotr Support hi, i am writing you because my score is abruptly down and it is unjustified, i already have 3 publications supposedly marked because the information is incomplete or omitted. please explain to me adequately what is wrong or omitted to lower my score in a unjustified manner. you are not answering my questions.